Putin-Schröder-Köpf-Pistorius: Scholz has to go and the new German National Security Strategy
What lying gossips. Röttgen wishes Pistorius the best, especially since the republic has to stick together in times of crisis. Completely ridiculous, as soon as the man is in office, the sawing starts again. From lack of competence, women´s quota in favor of Högl, above all that he was married to Gas-Gerd’s wife Schröder-Köpf and that the military commissioner Högl would suddenly have been the better option, especially because of parity everything is aired now as criticsm agianst Pistorius. In any case, the Münchner Merkur and other media made the story out of it again that Putin not only bought Gas-Gerd, but the Kremlin apparently also pursued Putin-Habsburg marriage policy: Happy Russia is marrying, not only Gas-Gerd, but also him Pistorius. With Doris Köpf It remains to be seen when not only Dr. Rahr and Dr. Hacke are Russian executive agents, but also Doris is a Russian marriage spy like Marija B/Putina. But the real target of the whole campaign is to topple Scholz anyway. You hit the sack and mean the donkey. Scholz has again hesitated to deliver Leo tanks, although the discussion in NATO circles and green and Union circles is much further: According to the New York Times, the USA have now taken a turn in their strategy and now wants to deliver really heavy war equipment to Ukraine, including short-range missiles, to realize Ben Hodge’s prediction that Crimea can be retaken by August 2023. Scholz is the objective disruptive factor, especially since the Greens and Toni Hofreither also attest: „Always too little and too late, no German leadership role within the EU and right away in NATO, or as Lindner explains: Germany should once again become the largest European military power after the USA in Europe. In Focus, nuclear weapons and the reintroduction of the German conscription military are now being demnanded loudly again, which is not wrong insofar as everything could be different again under Trump and in this respect an open and honest debate could actually be initiated again without all this tactical racketeering. However, these forces want to use the window of opportunity before a Trump reelection as soon as possible. According to the New York Times, there is now also a change in strategy in the USA and thatthey want to deliver really heavy weapons, not just Leos or whatever, and at the same time Melnyk is demanding warships, fighter planes and missiles. So one hopes for a quick option ala Hodges to recapture the Crimea by August 2023 or at least in the following time and to bring the whole thing as quickly as possible, purposefully and smoothly to an end. And therefore Scholz is THE big obstacle and hindrance, no matter what Stegner is still talking about. Under Scholz, there is talk of the German Sonderweg/special path, of a dictated peace. Nazi rhetoric reversed. There may also be a toppling of the oresent government by some sort of Lambsdorf paper in 1982 as Lindner has already drafted, especially since the FDP does not like the whole economic and financial policy with the traffic light coalition and the FDP is no longer elected in polls, but this time it is not so easy because a government reshuffle is no longer a question from 2 parties or just the FDP, which cannot aim for new elections, otherwise they could be kicked out, but this sort of conspiracy would have to get the Greens on board with Merz, Wüst or maybe Söder.
In the most desperate case, a hired „eco-terrorist“ or „climate RAF“ might organize an attack on Scholz or whatever, which would have killed 2 birds with one stone and BILD-Döpfner. Reichelt and Burda-Focus because would suppressed any further questions and turn the whole affair around by means of a campaign. These crocoilde tear dundies should just say what you actually want and mean by Germany’s leadership role? Just the next delivery of weapons, just the next personnel debate or not: Germany as a leading power with sufficient military equipment to deter Russia from attacking Europe, which European peace order is envisaged – with or without Russia, a new Iron Curtain and perhaps a German armed forces with nuclear weapons or even European nuclear weapons if you can no longer rely on US nuclear protection. That’s actually behind the whole Pisitorius debate, which aims at Scholz and the entire Ostpolitik SPD and thus the continued existence of the entire traffic light coalition. On the one hand, there is the question of whether the Hodges scenario in 2023 is to be implemented or the Korean solution ala Vad, Domroese and Milley, since the current state of arms deliveries means that no breakthrough by the Ukrainians can be hoped for and their offensive has been stalled. At the same time, there is always the fear that Putin is still conducting a northern offensive via Belarus and is only hoping for a revitalization of his own power by a ceasefire. Conversely, the question remains as to whether, in extreme cases, he might not unleash a Cuban crisis, which would then force a Korean solution.
It is essentially about whether you want to push through the Crimea liberation option, also risk a Cuban crisis, to what extent Germany will have a real military and political leadership power, what European peace order you can have after a Ukraine war or in the event of a ceasefire or a Korean solution ala Milley – with or without Russia, and how Germany and Europe share the division of labor in the simultaneous conflict between the USA and China. That’s what it’s all about, not Pistorius. So save those crocodile tears and get straight to the point. Let’s see if that will work with the announced National Security Strategy, which has now been delayed due to disagreements in the traffic light coalition and was scheduled after the Munich Security Conference in terms of time and content.